A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by views of the sea are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary attempts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were intended to Collect Visible evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the location became The most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned broadly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on no matter if interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second from the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair simply seeking to develop a spouse and children house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea in the course of a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for any predicament that lots of observers see as ever more typical. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been linked to community advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality on the coastline plus the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket should decide if the wall as developed complies with arranging authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.